Shitting the bed

When we think of “the greatest movies never made”, what usually comes to mind is Stanley Kubrick’s Napoleon, or Alejandro Jodorowsky’s Dune, Tim Burton’s Superman Lives, etc etc. But for me, it’s a movie that got made but it missed an unforgivable opportunity: Moonraker with Marlon Brando cast as Hugo Drax.

Moonraker, along with A View to a Kill and Die Another Day, is often considered the worst James Bond movie of all time. At least it’s thought of in that way to the average moviegoer. But for true Bond fans, it’s the ultimate guilty pleasure. Try watching the earlier Daniel Craig films then watch Moonraker and you’ll see how utterly batshit it is. But it’s so over-the-top that you eventually respect it.

Now I know that Michael Lonsdale’s portrayal of Hugo Drax is mostly well received. Sure, his villainous plan is bonkers but at least he was menacing. I personally felt that his acting was too wooden but he did give a respectable effort. But my question for Cubby Broccoli and the producers is “if you’re gonna shoot for the stars, why not get a star as your main villain?”. To my knowledge, Brando was never even in the discussion. Of course, Broccoli was notoriously cheap about certain things, which is why Industrial Light & Magic didn’t do the special effects (regrettably). This was at a time when Brando was commanding millions of dollars for only a few days of work. But with the life of Brando re-entering the public consciousness with Billy Zane playing him in an upcoming biopic, perhaps we’re only now realizing how flexible Brando might’ve been in negotiations.

Though in his mid-50s, Brando was still in his horndog phase by the late 1970s. Bond films notoriously had beautiful women running around set. Of course this might have set the stage for a possible MeToo moment (or maybe not since Brando felt like he was taken advantage of during Last Tango in Paris where the director made him show his penis in some deleted scenes), plus he probably still had the reputation for causing problems and delays in production. BUT, knowing what I know about Cubby Broccoli, the legendary producer would have treated Brando like royalty. Combine this with the fact that Hugo Drax has very little physical movement in the film and his weight would have been concealed by the Nehru suit, it seems like Brando might have lowered his usual rate of $2 million to $1 million for a few weeks of work. It definitely would have been easier than Apocalypse Now 🤷‍♂️

And Brando’s tendency to audible out of the script and direction would have fit the Roger Moore-era perfectly. Instead of being a run-of-the-mill villain, with Marlon Brando as Hugo Drax, Bond’s antagonist would have been an eccentric billionaire who was beyond reason. So what if one of the world’s greatest actors showed up to the set in drag?! We’re sending James Bond into space for fuck’s sake!

moon raker

Now hear me out:

If you get REALLY high, then Moonraker can become a decent, but not a GREAT film instead of the cocaine-fueled nightmare that is now.

What I love about the James Bond franchise is that it’s pure spectacle. It doesn’t shy away from that. In fact, it full on embraces it…at least during the 60s, 70s, and 80s.

What people don’t realize about the Sean Connery through Timothy Dalton era is that the plot DOES NOT MATTER. At all. Not in the slightest. They’re all screenplays based on story beats: 1) Cold open 2) Titles 3) Moneypenny/Q/M 4)Intro to villain, etc etc. and it always ends with the villain lair exploding and Bond fucking the Bond Girl. The facade of a story is always in service to hitting those beats.

It’s like listening to a Phil Spector produced album where the sheer scale of the production covers up the limitations of the artist.

Now Moonraker crosses the line from being spectacle to straight up insanity. It’s obvious that the producers were just throwing shit up on the screen in a desperate attempt to compete with Star Wars. But underneath all that bullshit, there is a decent James Bond film.

The scene that is often cited as being the moment Bond jumps the shark is the gondola chase. But did you know that that scene is completely useless? It advances the plot in no way. Who’s chasing Bond? Why are they chasing him? It’s assumed to be the villain’s henchmen, but that’s never made clear. As far as Bond knows, it’s just random dudes. There are no consequences for the chase either. You can cut it out completely, and nothing in the story would have been missed. Not even a story beat. The very next scene is a fight with a henchmen where a shit ton of glass gets broken. There is literally no point in the gondola chase.

Honestly, half the shit that takes place in Venice could be cut. Only two important things happen there: you learn that the villain is using a chemical agent in his diabolical plot and the Bond girl is actually a CIA agent. The death of the first henchmen takes place there, which explains the appearance of Jaws later in the film, but I’d argue that this character could be cut completely and nothing would be missed.

Could Jaws be cut out? Probably not. Unlike most things in this film, Jaws actually advances the plot. But his character could be made less ridiculous by introducing him in the Rio Carnival sequence (who cares why he’s there? It should be obvious). Unfortunately that stupid ass love interest ends up becoming useful for Bond at a key point, so that shit has to stay in. BUT all that crap afterwards can be cut out.

Now the film goes completely off the rails after Bond escapes the ambulance, and not much can be done to fix that. 007 has to go into space 🤷‍♂️. But if roughly 1/4 of the movie gets edited out, you’d have a nice little spy film.

I wish someone would make a fan edit of this.