Tag: Amazon Prime

Good fucking riddance đź«ˇ

So according to RedLetterMedia, along with the rest of the internet, movie theaters are dead.

Thank GOD, am I right?

I know that theater-going has been a religious-like experience for cinephiles for nearly 100 years. It sucks peen to some extent with the implication being that movies no longer hold the cultural relevance they once did. But with the supposed “death of theaters” something good is happening, I think.

Hear me out.

This is of course easy for me to say considering I’ve only been to the theaters maybe three times in the last decade. Many filmmakers would argue that movies are meant to be seen on the silver screen. This is of course an antiquated argument. With advancements in home theater technology, the theater is almost a hassle. Depending on which market you live in, going to the movies could cost nearly $50 with concessions. This is to say nothing about having to sit in a room with people who have no respect for the sanctity of watching a movie. To be honest, I never much understood the “communal experience” of the theater. I simply don’t give enough shit about other people’s raw emotions regarding a picture. My best experiences at the theater have been at matinees with maybe one other person in attendance; so in other words, it’s mostly me and my OWN thoughts. THAT’S how god intended movies to be watched. And if that’s the case, then the home theater has nullified the movie theater.

But I did mention that this is a good thing right? Because this is evolution; and cinema is evolving into a higher stage of art appreciation. It’s idiotic to associate the death of theaters with the death of cinema as a whole. We can piss and moan about the Internet and streaming services all day, but the fact is those two things have contributed to an even greater appreciation and interest in movies. Even in the shitty ones! Crap that was pumped out in the 70s and 80s and were largely forgotten for 30 years are finally having their day in court! I thought I was all alone in the world when I balled my eyes out while watching The Deer Hunter at 11 years old. Now, 106 years later, every dick and titty swinger on this planet has got opinions about that film! So contrary to popular opinion, I think movies are more popular than ever.

It’s just a couple of things have happened that has led to this paradigm shift in movie going experience: 1) movie theaters have become obnoxious and expensive. 2) wide scale releases have been limited to big-budget tentpole films. 3) competition from television and streaming services have likely contributed to more refined tastes (this one is more speculative). And 4) it’s cheaper to stay home and wait for the movie to hit Netflix or Amazon Prime.

killing james bond

Yo! Respect to Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson for killing off perhaps the most important character in film history (spoilers! 🤷‍♂️) Don’t believe that James Bond isn’t the most important? Well without this franchise, we probably wouldn’t have the modern action blockbuster. He was the model for the postmodern, morally questionable hero…before Han Solo, before Indiana Jones, before John McClain. James Bond was doing that shit before everyone.

And now he’s dead.

That takes balls.

I say fuck the fanboys. As Star Trek II director Nicholas Meyer said when he was told that he couldn’t kill Spock (paraphrase): “of course you can, as long as you do it well.”

Did they do it well? Don’t know. No Time To Die hasn’t been released in the States yet (they probably didn’t). But I will respect any filmmaker that takes chances.

Audiences be damned.

So where does the franchise go from here? The answer is obvious: HBO Max (or Apple TV, or Netflix, or Amazon Prime, etc). The James Bond Expanded Universe on television is the next logical step.

“But nobody cares about that universe without James Bond”

Perhaps. But the good thing about this universe is that the timeline does not matter. Seriously. Does Goldeneye happen before or after the events of Live and Let Die? Does it matter? Is Ralph Fiennes’ M the same as Bernard Lee’s? Does THAT matter?

You see, nothing in the James Bond timeline matters. With the exception of the Daniel Craig films, each film and each actor sort of takes place in its own timeline.

So in this James Bond extended universe, James Bond is still alive because why not?

So is James Bond the main character in this new series? If yes, then the series writes itself.

But if the producers made this dramatic move in No Time To Die just so they can free themselves to explore this universe, here’s my pitch (since Barbara and Michael aren’t taking my calls):

Series name: 00

Characters: Ralph Fiennes as M, Ben Whishaw as Q, Naomi Harris as Eve Moneypenney, Rory Kinnear as Tanner

New characters:

001: (Male, 50-60yrs) An old Irish bastard. Hard hitter, hard drinker. Has been a 00 longer than anyone. Was actually a family man at some point against the wishes of Her Majesty’s Service, but naturally fucked it up. Has been wanting to reconnect with his son for years, but his son wants nothing to do with him.

002: (Male, 40s) Borderline autistic, has no close personal relationships. But make no mistake: this mother fucker can kill. Not much is known about his background.

003: (Female, 20s) the newest member of the service. She was one of the first women to get into the SAS before joining MI6. Fresh off of her first mission, she appears to be experiencing a degree of PTSD. 001 takes her under his wing and treats her as a surrogate daughter to make up for his deficiencies as a father.

004: (Male, 20-early 30s) a total cad. Along with James Bond, he often stays in trouble with M. Not liked by many in M16. A snarky, fratish type.

005: (Female, 40-50s) a seasoned veteran of MI6. There’s no situation she can’t handle masterfully. Often a part of M’s “A-Team”, she gets dispatched on the more difficult missions. The perfect female counterpart of James Bond, an expert seductress.

Recurring characters:

006: Alec Trevelyan (Male, 30-50)-James Bond’s best friend in the service. However, he holds a secret grudge against the British government. Will later be “betrayed” by 007.

007: James Bond (Male, 30-50)- The GOAT.

The Story:

M is ripping one of his agents a new asshole. It’s 001. He’s too old, M says. He’s a drunk and they already have enough alcoholics on the force (James Bond). But there’s still one more mission for 001.

“Don’t cock it up,” says M.

It’s not a difficult mission, but he’s getting a partner: 003. 001 resents this but follows orders. He banters with Moneypenny and goes to Q to gather his equipment. But instead of the flirty charm of 007, he’s cantankerous and crusty. He understands none of the technology that Q gives him.

001 and 003 go through the usual formula: they go undercover, enjoy the finer things in life, go to bed with numerous individuals, and cause plenty of property damage. And they do it with their own spin and charm. However, the mustache-twirling villain has a much bigger plot under his sleeve, one which has international implications.

With the plot spread globally, the mission comes under the direction of Tanner. We are introduced to the other 00 agents and their individual missions in different parts of the world.

But when things start to get real, M has no other choice but to bring in the big guns: 006 and 007. This culminates in 007s supposed “betrayal“ of 006, and while Bond temporarily plays the hero, 001 and 003 overcome their differences to save the day.

The mission is interwoven with the personal drama of 001 and 003.

Bond once said that 00s often have short life expectancies. 001 is aware that he faces death at every turn; the next mission could be his last. And he has been on too many missions. His demise in the season finale will serve as a reminder to 003: death is never an option.