I was driving 90 in a 35 in my brand new Fiat 500L when my mind started to wander. Whatever happened to Niell Blomkamp, I thought. So after crashing my Serbian-made piece of shit into the side of a Cracker Barrel, I crawled home with a lacerated artery and put on my copy of Chappie to see where it all went wrong. And truth be told, I had some mixed feelings. But thankfully, after losing several liters of blood, my thoughts suddenly became clearer.
Was it a bad movie?
No
Was it a good movie?
No
So it was just a meh movie?
Also no
Like any movie that swings for the fences, it is all of the above. So Blomkamp is like Icarus in many ways. And he shouldn’t be punished for that. He should be celebrated. But the problem with Chappie is that it tries to do too much in the span of two hours. As a result, this is one of those rare films that I think deserves to be longer. Yet, with that said, in an era prior to the 2010s, this story could have been easily told within a 120 minute timeframe. Blomkamp did it in 2009, very very successfully. District 9, the film that put him on the map and is the spiritual predecessor to this movie, clocks in at 1 hour and 52 minutes. The very same techniques that Blomkamp deployed there were also used for Chappie.
So what changed?
I felt that District 9 asked a lot out of its audience by sacrificing plot minutiae in favor of style, flow, and emotional resonance. It worked. But this Blomkamp recipe is quite exacting and elusive — it won’t work every time. It arguably didn’t work for Elysium and it didn’t quite work here. Strangely, in my view, what failed Elysium and Chappie were two different things. For Elysium, it was casting (Matt Damon was horribly miscast). But for Chappie, it is a more common and recognizable reason—an uneven script. I can applaud Blomkamp for wanting to explore the nature of consciousness, soul, and one’s relation to their maker, but it was done too heavy handed. Additionally, the set up was clumsily executed as it’s about 20 minutes and heavily contrived. “Chappie”, or the robot that would become Chappie, needed to land in the hands of Die Antwoord at around the 10 minute mark. Hugh Jackman’s character, and his inter office rivalry with Dev Patel, needed to be introduced with the primary plot already underway. The performances are effective, including the ones from Yolandi and Ninja of Die Antwoord, and especially from Dev Patel. The problem though is that Patel’s character is undercooked. Or overcooked depending on how you want to look at it because the quality of this movie is so hard to describe. A studio note from me would have been to make Patel less of an idealist and more of a tech-savvy but self-serving businessman whose appreciation of Chappie grows over the course of the film. Of course, his inter office rivalry would have made the film even more derivative of Robocop. But as I often say, who gives a shit? The point is to make Chappie the emotional core that all the violence and chaos orbits around.
But for all of its faults, for better or worse, Chappie is undeniably Blomkamp’s vision. The final sequence of action set pieces and the confrontation with Jackman feels earned. This is where Niell Blomkamp shines — the movie has a strong heart with blood pumping through its veins. (Which I won’t have for much longer until the paramedics arrive 😬)



